Teen Vaping Crisis: Latest News from Bloomberg and FDA
Andrew Mass Democrat presidential candidate bullied to do something unprecedented in a Thursday discussion. He announced that he will provide 1,000 to 10 random homes during the year. This idea reflects the proposal to give all US adults $ 1,000 a month, which is called a “free dividend”.
However, discussion experts quickly raised the question of whether it was justified that the presidential candidate would give money to voters. The amount provided money from his pocket to prove that his plan could make people’s lives better, but this money is what comes out of his campaign safe .
CBS news Ed O’Keefe asked the amount after discussion. When both lawyers asked if they confirmed the conversation with the election lawyer, the amount was “Oh, of course. We can spend more than a million dollars for millionaires to buy their way at the election stage I live in a world where I can, and I think it’s appropriate for everyone, but I literally give money all over the US, and there seems to be a problem that I want to help improve the quality of life. “
Deborah Hellman, professor of law at the University of Virginia who wrote about campaign finance law, said he didn’t think the proposal was illegal because he did not implicitly or explicitly ask for something instead. .
“I don’t think it’s illegal because the quantity proposal doesn’t suggest voters give money, whether explicit or implied, for their votes,” Hellman said. “The reason why the proposal can be a problem is because voters can feel grateful to the sheep and worry about voting for that reason.”
However, the Supreme Court revealed that there was no festive corruption.
“We worry about the details about the debt of appreciation that elected civil servants can feel to wealthy individuals who make great contributions to the campaign or consume a lot of money to support the campaign I need to do that, ”Hellman added.
Campaign finance expert Rick Hasen, who teaches campaign finance at the University of California, Irvine Law School, tweeted that Thursday’s Yang tactics did not violate campaign finance laws.
“There are no legal issues unrelated to voting or registration.” “I am not considered personal use by the candidate. It is a form of advertising in the campaign.”Hasan added,
Mr. Yang, an entrepreneur, his plan to provide universal basic income allows people to pursue occupations and take care of their families without fear of putting food on the table Said that would be. He has been the center board of his unique candidacy and is good enough to take him to his debate on Thursday.
Both presidents’ approaches paid little to the unknown before running for president. The amount addressed the least time on the Thursday night stage, but was the biggest trend in the discussion Twitter.Tags: Teen Vaping Crisis, Bloomberg and FDA, Bloomberg, FDA, Teen Vaping